The instrument utilized was the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS) developed by Zhang, Jensen, and Mann in 1996.This scale is used to measure six leadership behaviors: training and instruction, democratic, autocratic, social support, positive feedback, and situational consideration.Tags: Research Papers Inion SystemsChicago Style Bibliographic EssayParts Of EssayFormal Letter For Application SpmPsychology Nature Vs Nurture EssayRise Of Periodical Essay In The 18th CenturyPersonal Perfect World EssayCritical Thinking And Communication SkillsResearch Proposal ThesisPrisons Effective Essays
In general, females scored much higher than did the male coaches.
A MANOVA was also used to examine the data for differences between the three levels of coaching (junior high, high school, and college) with regard to leadership behavior in general.
There were significant differences between the three levels.
When breaking down the six behaviors and examining them individually, an ANOVA was used to analyze the data.
This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.
That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.
Following the information on threats to internal validity, the student provided suggestions regarding how these threats could have been dealt with. Not only does the student know what the weakness of the study are, he provides ways the study could have been improved. Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale. The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS), between male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. The first hypothesis was that male and female coaches would respond differently to the RLSS in overall leadership behaviors.
One thing that was not discussed in this paper is the literature review. The second hypothesis was that differences on the RLSS would occur among coaching levels: junior high, high school, and college.
Again, because the data for the RLSS is ordinal, an ANOVA is not the best analysis tool.
The three coaching levels scored differently on three of the six behaviors: democratic behaviors, training and instruction, and social support.