It should start general at the beginning, become more specific in the middle, and then become more general again at the end.
The introduction goes from general to specific and is the place for contextualizing the topic, research question, and hypothesis.
The discussion should never be omitted, since this is where science usually happens, in the interpretation of the results collected and presented.
A scientific manuscript should be shaped like an hourglass.
is run by a tight group of early- and mid-career scientists who believe that, as editors, we play an important role in helping colleagues disseminate their science.
Inc Business Plan - Research Paper Materials
We wish to thank readers and authors for the trust they have demonstrated in us and in this new journal.As other editors have noted , manuscripts that describe routine analysis of routine materials with entirely predictable results are not entirely compelling, and we are likely to reject such manuscripts, especially if the authors do not make a case for how the results impact the field at large.The impact does not have to be Earth-shattering, but it should be noteworthy to an intended audience.Researchers must explain why their results are significant. This means that authors need to make an effort to avoid unnecessary jargon, and use specific yet clear vocabulary, which implies that sometimes definitions need to be reiterated.Other questions to address in the discussion include: What is different about the field now that the results are obtained? does not impose constraints on article formatting, e.g.Because we are a relatively new journal, and because we have a broad scope, we see many different kinds and qualities of manuscripts come across our desks.This variety, as we find our footing in the materials science community, gives us a good sense of the breadth of writing practices that characterize materials science manuscripts.The abstract should be an extremely brief shrunken-down version of the entire paper.It should follow the same general order as the manuscript itself: it should give some background and motivate the challenge addressed (introduction), describe the experimental framework (methods), tell readers what was found (results), and describe how the results answer the challenge and why the report is noteworthy or significant (discussion).Over 1600 authors have contributed to nearly 300 articles published in our first year of existence.We have greatly enjoyed reading about all the excellent materials science research that authors have shared with us since we launched last year.