The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks for its importance, and an educated reader may well be insulted that they are not allowed to judge the importance for themselves.
They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales advertisement.
This is why it is still good practice to begin research in an academic library.
Any journals found there can be regarded as safe and credible.
Whilst some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, this is best avoided.
For example, a review of Victorian Age Physics may certainly present J. Thomson’s famous experiments in a chronological order.
All sides of an argument must be clearly explained, to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted.
A literature review is likewise not a collection of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources.
In such a case, the review usually precedes the methodology and results sections of the work.
Producing a literature review may also be part of graduate and post-graduate student work, including in the preparation of a thesis, dissertation, or a journal article.