One result of this has been that phenomena like motion and time are analyzed into a succession of points. As , so that we provide the reader with continuity from Plato and Kant. “The first implies that we move round the object, the second that we enter into it.Concepts, especially if they are simple, have the disadvantage of being symbols, substituted for the object they symbolize. The first depends on the point of view at which we are placed and on the symbols by which we express ourselves.
One result of this has been that phenomena like motion and time are analyzed into a succession of points. As , so that we provide the reader with continuity from Plato and Kant. “The first implies that we move round the object, the second that we enter into it.Tags: Italian Restaurant Business PlanPhotosythesis Word EquationPhd Thesis On International BusinessAmistad Slave Ship EssaysDirectory Disposable Email Paper Report Research Sales WipeDivision Essay ExampleThesis Mba HrResearch Paper GoogleCauses Of Poverty In Developing Countries Essay
In discursive thinking one thing is perceived after another, , that is, with degrees of density and rhythm. It works horizontally as the opposite to analysis and discursive thinking, in the rather dense domain of ‘hard’ natural science, as well as in less dense psychological and spiritual realms. “Propensity may be described as a generalization of dynamism. This conception also forms an essential part of Bergson’s doctrine.
Both a horizontal and a vertical movement thus characterize intuition. This view is developed into a , in the sense that the void, the vacuum, has a structure, and is itself a field of propensities, which are real. The dualism of the full and the empty, matter and space or field, is, up to a point, preserved, as a distinction between the realization of a propensity, and the propensity to be realized. The intellect is regarded by him as a kind of instrument or tool employed in the service of life. I will apply the same structure as in the preceding sections on Plato and Kant, and work at three issues.
Reality does not share with us an intuition of its inner nature, until we painstakingly have acquainted ourselves with its outer manifestations. For the sake of clearness, we should here repeat that Bergson draws a general distinction between two directions of our thinking effort, as is the case with Buddhism as well. One is the attention spirit gives to matter the other is the attention spirit gives to life, that is, to itself. The same ritual is to be found in many cultures, e.g. Their action at vanishing distances is preserved in the form of the field theory. As time is pivotal in this respect, a paragraph will be devoted to this issue.
The former is typically the discursive intellect, while the latter is normally assigned to intuition. Central forces, which correspond to the Aristotelian inherent potentialities, give place to fields of potentialities of a relational character.”  Gunter, 1987, p. I will end with an outline of Bergson’s method of intuition, the metaphysical. In a footnote, he mentions that the distinction between intellect and intuition is sharpened, due to an increasing need for precision. What does he mean?
In working this way intuition is approaching a flowing state of mind best characterized as a consciousness,.
How this goes about will be delineated in a separate section below. When examined closely, we find that they retain only between similar objects. The second neither depends on a point of view nor relies on any symbol.Also, we easily persuade ourselves that by setting concept beside concept we are reconstructing the whole of the object, with its parts, obtaining so to speak its intellectual equivalent. The first kind of knowledge may be said to stop at the , and the second, in those cases where it is possible, to attain the absolute.” The former is characteristic of the discursive intellect, the latter of intuition.Were all the translationsof a poem into all possible languages to add together their various shades of meaning and, correcting each other by a kind of mutual retouching, to give a more and more faithful image of the poem they translate, they would yet never succeed in rendering the inner meaning of the . Or suppose that I wished to communicate to someone who did not know Greek the extraordinarily simple impression that a passage in Homer makes upon me; I should first give a translation of the lines, I should then comment on my translation, and then develop the commentary; in this way, by piling up explanation on explanation, I might approach nearer and nearer to what I wanted to express; but I should never quite reach it.”“When you raise your arm, you accomplish a movement of which you have, from within, a simple perception; but for me, watching it from the outside, your arm passes through one point, then through another, and between these two there will be still other points; so that, if I began to count, the operation would go on forever. It is an increasing awareness of this relationship. As with Plato, the emphasis upon antecedent causes and geometrical cosmology is preserved, and used to describe the distribution of matter in the world. First, I will elaborate Bergson’s distinction between intuition and the analytical nature of the discursive intellect.The analytic activity participates in the unity of duration and intuition is in no way alien to it. The theory of vorticular movement and fluids of the Cartesians is preserved in the form of the law of conservation of energy. Secondly, examples on the workings of intuition are given.The challenge posed to metaphysics, is to transcend concepts in order to reach intuition. No wonder the . His use of the word immediacy does not differ significantly from Kant’s, and the reader may refer to that discussion. This theory was further developed by Darwin’s followers to include the understanding that the human intellect and the process of thinking are designed for wholly practical purposes.Larsson, in his reading of Bergson, argues that the use of the word intuition almost always indicates a synthesis, and that it is the direct antonym to discursive thinking and nothing else. Their aim is to help the individual adjust himself to his world and to facilitate action.This approach is in important respects, identical to Plato’s dialogue and to Kant’s synthetic method. The counter analysis resonates very well with the transcendental analytic method, which is integral to the complete synthetic method.