Once you're beyond undergraduate level I think that (at least in many cases) there can be a solid argument for saying to students "If you can't convincingly justify why your answer is right, why should it be considered an answer at all? The student needs to progress beyond a secondary-school mindset at some point and actually move toward the world they're trying to prepare for -- one without a set of ideal solutions, where you have to convince people why what you did is correct.That's not so say there's less work for the person teaching them; some kind of in depth feedback about the suitability of the justification of the answers is needed; in an academic setting the work and the value of the justifications offered should be discussed, either verbally (analogous to the feedback from a presentation or seminar) or in writing (analogous to feedback on a paper), albeit at a somewhat lower level than those activities -- such feedback can come from peers and people in the role of mentors (the professor and any assistants for example) - one or the other or both, as suits the nature of the activity.Certainly an arguable [email protected]$$ scheme, but really very silly and resource-wasting, apart from substantially insulting to very erudite and scholarly math faculty. Although I do try to remind myself, and my students, that education, not assessment, is the goal, The System (in the U.
Once you're beyond undergraduate level I think that (at least in many cases) there can be a solid argument for saying to students "If you can't convincingly justify why your answer is right, why should it be considered an answer at all? The student needs to progress beyond a secondary-school mindset at some point and actually move toward the world they're trying to prepare for -- one without a set of ideal solutions, where you have to convince people why what you did is correct.Tags: Causes Of World War I EssayAct Essay Natural Not Other SexEssay About National Education DayInternet Is Harmful EssayGeneral Paper Model Essays On TourismCreative Writing Courses In NycI Should Be Doing Homework
If I wanted to have sessions where I answered questions before an exam, or after the exam, that was okay.
I could even give away answers during an exam, if I wanted to.
and, hopefully, students to learn why/how they're missing a/the mark.
Also, I did wish to demonstrate irrefutably that the issues I asked student to address could be easily, fluently, in-finite-time, no fudging, no weaseling, be answered from an expert viewpoint... :) It seems to me that implicit in the question is a sort of quasi-litiginous attitude, that there should be an objective standard [sic] against which students can compare the grading [sic] of their attempts, to possibly argue against loss of "points".
If a student demanded answers, I could provide answers, if I wanted to.
However, if I decided to do something different instead, I could.For instance, if I wished to focus on the college's goal of instilling professionalism, and discourage an unwarranted sense of entitlement, I could say that the student had no right to control me, and so I was not required to give answers.So, based on my experience, I would assume that the professor has no such requirement unless there is a (probably written) policy that imposes such a requirement on the professor.They should have some actual practice at this in their education.On the other hand I recognize that sometimes there are policies in place which could make this more difficult with undergrads.] On a somewhat indirectly related note -- at least for mathematically related subjects, giving students numeric solutions before they have answered the questions themselves often seems positively harmful.There's not enough detail in the question to tell whether the nature of the particular activity is a case which is better fitted by requiring students to convincingly justify their answers as part of answering the question with no ideal solution to be provided, or whether it's better fitted by giving them solutions.[Actually I think some of this kind of thing should come in much sooner, at least in the later part of undergraduate level work -- since many students who graduate and go into the workforce will be in a similar position of having to justify why their work is correct without there ever being "correct answers" available.It very often leads students to abandon thinking about the characteristics of the problem in any deep way in favor of trying random things until they happen to match the solution, without actually coming to any kind of understanding of what they're doing; their focus is on getting the specific number in this particular instance rather than on the comprehension of ideas needed for dealing with that kind of problem.As a quasi-answer, I'd note that for all the (university, math) classes I've taught in the last 20 years (that is, especially after the internet...) I've provided extensive "discussion/approved-solutions" to all homework and/or exam questions, at both undergrad and grad level.Mostly, this is to show an (attempted) for writing style, format, tone, assumed context, etc.It is only incidental to make some point about why grading was as it was, which in my view is a very minor thing.