Majoring in history or political science may help you to learn to think critically, and that is a skill that is valuable in fields like medicine and law, but its unlikely to lead to the same level of monetary reward as someone who pursues, say, a Masters In Business Administration.On some level, colleges have become vocational school almost as much as they are “institutions of higher learning.” I’m not sure whether that is a good or a bad thing, but it’s the world that we live in and it’s unlikely to change.Tags: Phd Thesis On Employer BrandingGoogle Business Plan TemplateOrganization Of An EssayIntroduction To Personal EssayEssays On Cause And EffectGood English ThesisSailing To Byzantium Essay QuestionsTaj Mahal Essay
Students who took courses heavy on both reading (more than 40 pages a week) and writing (more than 20 pages in a semester) showed higher rates of learning. I would think it would be, but on some level such an analysis would seem to ignore the reasons that students go to college today.
Unlike in the past, when a college education was viewed as an opportunity for learning, there seems to be more of a focus today on learning skills that will lead to a high rate of monetary return after college.
Ann Althouse, who teaches law at the University of Wisconsin, wonders why the study concentrates so much on the students and not the professors: It strikes me as a fair point considering that it is sort of difficult to teach someone a skill you don’t possess yourself.
Another blogger points out that this isn’t just an indictment of college education in the U. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The Beltway, The Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook The field of study breakdown is almost precisely what I was going to predict before getting to that point of your post!
There’s scholarship pointing to a connection among deriving most of one’s information via reading (as contrasted with listening or watching), abstract reasoning, and critical thinking.
I also have observed that younger people seem to have extremely short attention spans.The engineers (using that as a catch-all term) think philosophy is airy-fairy and that critical thinking is only useful in problem-solving.The bulk of religious parents think philosophy and critical thinking are a threat. spends more on education in total dollars terms and per capita than any other country in the world. The median wage for that, around ,000, is pretty darned good.Usually this elicits hoots of derision from the number-crunchers, engineers and other applied science guys who tend to be over-represented online. We can’t teach critical thinking for one reason above all others: religion.Critical thinking threatens parents who rather stupidly imagine that the point of education is to turn their children into exact duplicates of themselves.Students majoring in business, education, social work and communications showed the least gains in learning.However, the authors note that their findings don’t preclude the possibility that such students “are developing subject-specific or occupationally relevant skills.” Greater gains in liberal arts subjects are at least partly the result of faculty requiring higher levels of reading and writing, as well as students spending more time studying, the study’s authors found.S.: By the time our kids get to college it is too late to change habits por learn new skills that should have been taught to them in grade k-12 in my opinion. The traditional academic fields — math, science, history, philosophy, social sciences, etc. That’s pretty much the whole point of those fields: Applied reasoning.This study does not merely condemn colleges, it throws a harsh light on our primary education system on this country. Students do not walk into college blank slates, but as products of the education they received for twelve years before that. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J. The vocational-technical field, meanwhile, are engaged in training and/or credentialing for the job market.In general, the US doesn’t pay our teachers well (compared to other professions and other nations), nor do we reward them for excellence, nor do we often provide them with a system that accurately assesses their efforts (i.e., No child left behind ring any bells? If colleges are failing at their primary mission, it isn’t necessarily their fault. That’s fine insofar as it goes — getting a job after graduation is a laudable goal!— but it’s silly to then complain that you didn’t get a real college education.